Hunting Hunter Part 3
Was the US refusing Information from the Ukraine AG on Corruption?
To put the following in perspective, Ukraine had previously received natural gas from Russia that they were dependent on. After Russia and Ukraine had the tensions on their border with Russia, over Russia’s efforts to annex part of Ukraine, to become Russian territory. This tension resulted in natural gas shipments being halted from Russia to Ukraine.
However, the US had assured Ukraine they would help them develop their own petroleum products. Thus for petroleum companies in Ukraine it appeared a large windfall was coming. One such company which stood to gain enormously from the situation was Burismo Holding, where Hunter Biden had been hired as a member of their board. George Soros’ company had also moved in.
As is common knowledge now that Joe Biden admitted to having a Ukraine Attorney General fired before he would release US Loans to Ukraine. (The pretense was under a guise to root out corruption in Ukraine) This Attorney General was Viktor Shokin, who at the time was investigating Burismo, a natural gas company.
Burismo was the company Hunter Biden was reported working for, and on their board of directors. The Attorney General Viktor Shokin, who was fired, was planning to question Hunter Biden on money Transfers. After he was fired another Prosecutor Kulyk reopened the investigation. Kulyk according to allegations, wasn’t himself entirely free from corruption himself. It appears to be a common trait in Ukraine government. (like the Democrat party) Which may be why some charges were not taken as seriously as they should have been.
He according to Hill reporter; JOHN SOLOMON, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR, said over $3 ,000,000 was transferred to accounts connected with Hunter Biden. Also 7 Billion dollars was transferred out of Ukraine to the United States and other countries. Possibly part of a money laundering scheme.
Ukraine’s National Anti-Corruption bureau, which the US had helped set up, appears to have had it’s own corruption problems. Kulyk accused the agency of assisting in the election of Hillary Clinton’s in 2016. They were accused of finding dirt on President Trump. For instance providing information about Paul Manafort, who had previously worked on President Trumps campaign. It was also said the Ukraine government was handing over information to Democrat party officials.
While as previously said, corruption was very widespread in Ukraine government, thus the charges made could be overlooked as just part of that corruption. Kulyk said they had contacted US Attorney Barr wanting to hand over all the evidence they had, but was having problems getting passports from the US embassy. And it appeared nobody in the US Attorney Generals office was interested.
The author of the original report by BY JOHN SOLOMON, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR to the Hill, said however there was much corroborating information which made the information credibility worth investigating, which others have called for, yet no investigation has so far been forthcoming.
Another report was that the Obama Administration and George Soros had a joint fund that a prosecutor was investigating, and the US governement had the investigation halted. George Soros did own a petroleum company that was investing in production of petroleum from fracking in the Ukraine. It is also interesting that George Soros has been a large contributor to the US Democrat Party.
According to Google Search, George Soros, In June 2015, donated $1 million to the Super PAC Priorities USA Action, which supported Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential race. He donated $6 million to the PAC in December 2015 and $2.5 million in August 2016.
An investigation into Hunter Biden’s actions in Ukraine, The Obama Administration’s Ukraine-Soros connection, Democrat Party funding and contribution handling for 2016, Hillary Clinton Campaign Contributions, and George Soros’ involvement with the Obama Administration, Ukraine government, His Ukraine Petroleum company. All should be INVESTIGATED!
A special council should be set up, and be even more extensive than the Mueller’s investigation. inquiring minds want to know. Is this possibility why the Democrats have been so frantic to remove Donald Trump hastily. I think so. But it won’t work.
by Jim Kirk-Wiggins, October 17, 2019, Liberi Press.
*The Hill, BY JOHN SOLOMON, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR — 04/07/19 07:30 AM EDT